celestron starsense explorer dx 102az vs 130az

This is exactly the same model from Celestron just being sold with different marketing and so is worth comparing the prices to find the best deal. If on the other hand youre willing to spend a bit more for telescope that are more powerful but will require a bit more tinkering, the SkyWatcher Dobsonian 6-inch or the skyquest XT6 is most certainly worth looking into too. Similar cost. In that regard you cant completely be reliant on the app, which may or may not be reasonably accurate considering the quality of your phones camera nevertheless, this shouldnt be a deal breaker if you were to decide on this telescope. Celestrons main explanation is that many beginners would buy the bracket and attempt to fit it onto substandard telescopes (or simply do it improperly) and become frustrated. Youre at the right place. It has all the same pros and cons as the 8-inch model above, except that they are even more extreme even higher power and viewing capacity, but also even heavier and bigger. ), Deimos vs Titan (How Are They Different? I went ahead and ordered the 102mm. All you need to do is install the app, enter the unlock code that came with your telescope, and dock the phone to your telescope. Overall, this is the most entry-level of the four telescopes in this range. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Theres a hex nut inside the dovetail clamp; a socket wrench will do the job. New York, Rating: 9/10. In this article, we provide an overview of the differences between these telescopes so that you can understand the pros and cons of each. The good news is you can at least upgrade your Celestron finderscope later. They take care of employees and no work pressure and fun at work. After a career that included making telescopes and editing a photography magazine, he became an author of popular astronomy books including Complete Guide to Stargazing, 101 Things to Spot in the Night Sky and Night Sky Atlas. ), Deimos vs Uranus (How Are They Different? Socket wrench + normal wrench should do the trick if I recall correctly. A large 10" parabolic primary mirror with XLT coatings helps you make the most of StarSense technology. This mount is a little on the small side for either optical tube, but it works just fine. However, due to how simple and easy it is to use as result of the app, its not a bad comprise despite being less accurate. This is much less precise than a real GoTo system with tracking but much simpler, easier, and more reliable than a motorized telescope. The red dot finderscope is decent as are all of the other accessories too. The only major complaint was to do with the inaccuracy of the apps tracking ability, especially when users decided to look further out. However, refractors are traditionally more robust than reflectors, so there is no ideal instrument to suit everyone. Can you explain how they are still about equal in light gathering? The main advantage of the 102mm is nothing to adjust (optically). Although the Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ didn't make into our list of the best telescopes (opens in new tab) for 2021, it's still an excellent piece of kit for those just starting out in skywatching, especially those who are hunting for an all-inclusive package that's easy to use and makes navigating the night sky a breeze. Is LT127 a better choice? You can find the Celestron dx 130az on Amazon which costs around $450. The diagonal provided by Celestron uses a roof prism rather than a simple mirror, giving a non-reversed image so you can use the instrument by day as well as by night. I love the starsense suggestions and how many things you can see in a short session. I realized that it was very important for me that it the telescope be kid friendly. The Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ is an achromatic refractor, with a 102 mm doublet lens composed of two different types of glass. This is not to be confused with smartphone attachments that simply enable you to take photos of bright objects through the eyepiece, as found on some other beginners instruments. Overall, this is the best option if you value a higher aperture for better views. The 130 is better but still pretty small for that price. The StarSense Explorer app is ridiculously easy to set up. No, a dedicated short focal length eyepiece is better. Once chosen, you see a set of arrows on the screen that tells you which way to move the telescope to get to that object. What Do The Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZs Specifications Mean? Skies & Scopes 2023. At this aperture and focal ratio, there is a fair amount of chromatic aberration, but sharp views of the Moon and planets are still possible. The initial advent of computerized star catalogs, which were loaded into telescope handsets, made it possible to align a telescope on the sky by pointing it at just three bright stars. The images will generally be sharper because misalignment isnt very common, Refractor based devices tend to be more expensive than their similarly powered reflector counterparts (A 4 inch reflector may only set you back $100 one example being the. Unwary users are likely to try polishing it with glass cleaner or even abrasive solutions. Thanks to your phones limited battery life and computing power, the StarSense Explorer technology obviously cant take a new picture of the sky every time you move the telescope. It shares many of the characteristics of the other refractor in the range above in that it is smaller, lighter, and less cumbersome to operate, but it is more powerful with the larger aperture and you will be able to see more through it. You cant also take pictures of the sky with the help of the telescope. Alignment procedure depends on a mirror, which collects dew, Instrument is stiff to move without slow motions. This telescope is full of design flaws. Smartphones can be fitted into a spring-loaded slider on the StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ, allowing for basic astrophotography. Also can you recommend some good telescopes which are available for $400 price range or less.I really dont want to spend more as I dont know if my son will want to pursue this in the future. The StarSense Explorer DX 102 includes two 1.25 eyepieces: a 25mm Super Konig providing 26x and a 10mm Konig providing 65x. You can find the Celestron dx 130az on Aliexpress for a relatively cheaper price. The accessory tray is a nice, sturdy affair and an actual tray rather than the silly eyepiece rack supplied with many scopes. Patented, award-winning StarSense sky recognition technology uses your smartphone to analyze star patterns overhead and calculate the telescope's position in real-time. UNLEASH THE POWER OF YOUR SMARTPHONE: Let your iPhone or Android phone take you on a guided tour of the night skyno telescope experience required. Its not a bad telescope to have. There's also the Explorer DX 130AZ . Whereas Celestron dx 130az has an aperture of a whopping 130 mm. ==>Click Here To Check TheCelestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZsPricing On Amazon! However, the system has a few notable limitations that could curtail observing sessions. In terms of which one is right for you, there are two key things to look at it price and size: The fact that the price difference is fairly large actually helps narrow it down as, if you know your budget, you just need to pick what matters to you most: Please let us know if you have any questions by leaving a comment below. Galaxies, nebulaes, star clusters and large parts of the messier should be viewable although there may be issues showing accurate colours with some stars. So, there are issues of ghosting and internal reflection. The mount's not even ideal. Astrophotography with Nikon D3200: Can It Be Better? Its not as good at viewing faint objects in outer space unlike a reflector or a compound device. The telescope attaches to the mount using a standard dovetail, but as it came out of the box the clamp assembly was twisted through 180 degrees, with the locking screw at the bottom. Normally, this is done for astrophotography to avoid performing a time-consuming GoTo alignment and is only used to find one target. how do they compare? So, if you want a telescope that can form clearer images, go for the Celestron Starsense Explorer dx 130az. Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ Reviewed: Partially Recommended Due to an a enclosed tube being used, the optics wont need to be cleaned or collimated all the time. The new Celestron StarSense Explorer telescopes use your smartphone to make it much easier to find planets, galaxies, and other objects to look at. Yes, you can take astrophotography pictures with the Celestron StarSense Explorer telescopes using a smartphone adapter like this basic one or this premium one. Have you tried this model and would you recommend it? On your phones screen, youll see the current position of your telescope. Before the purchase, be sure to install the StarSense Explorer app on your phone. Sony A7III vs A7RIII Astrophotography: Which One to Shoot Infinity! A simple slot-and-turn system would be much less aggravating for astronomers, unless you intend to use the instrument solely as a piece of furniture permanently set up in the corner of the room or do without the tray altogether. We dont have this model in my country but I saw a Celestron Starsense Explorer LT 127AZ being sold brand new. When the bullseye turns green, its ready to view in the telescopes eyepiece. They are generally more expensive though. This means we may be compensated if you click links on this page at no extra cost to you. So, as you can see both telescopes have their strong and weak points. The StarSense Explorer DX 102 includes two 1.25" eyepieces: a 25mm "Super" Konig providing 26x and a 10mm Konig providing 65x. What these StarSense Explorer telescopes do is attach your smartphone then, using the app, scan the night sky above you, tell you what you can see on that particular night, and then guide you to it. For relative beginner (upgrade from binoculars! especially in a light polluted city environment, Would still recommend a Dobsonian instead but the GTi is a huge upgrade over the StarSense Explorer. Interestingly, it seems the 130mm is also now out of stock. The erect-image diagonal (which is necessary to allow the instrument to focus) introduces very little distortion, only marginally noticeable on a star image using a magnification of 130x. The downside to large dobsonians like this is the size they are heavy and large. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. The Celestron Omni XLT 150 is available here but is priced way above my budget. What about the Skywatcher skymax 102, 127 AZ GTI WIFI telescope? For a summary of the entire discussion take a look at this table: Between these two Newtonian and refractor telescopes Celestron dx 130az is a better option. One major source of problems is the mirror that is crucial to finding objects. These are very average specs and maybe even subpar when you consider reflector telescopes tend to offer a lot more bang for the buck nevertheless, the specs . Just about light enough for car travel and capable of really sharp image quality it's nevertheless a poor choice for astrophotographers. Bear in mind that not all smartphones will work, so remember to check your model against a list on the Celestron website before taking the plunge. You wont be able to see many details but large planets will be visible. Im very interested in the cosmos but being a chemistry student, I dont have much time to learn the precise location of Messier objects, how to find planets, and looking at the moon over and over gets boring (when you dont know what youre doing) comparing this to a Dob 8 in my opinion is like comparing a truck to sports car. Here lately though, it has not been able to track location. Many people have asked on astronomy forums and contacted Celestron themselves, asking why the bracket and code cannot be sold as a stand-alone item. In essence, what it does is take a snapshot of the sky and use computer algorithms and star maps to figure out where it is pointing. Both are pretty mediocre, a Dob would probably be a better choice. The eyepieces supplied, although in lightweight plastic barrels, are of good optical quality. If you compare their size, 130az is quite big and heavy. Best regards, Celestron StarSense Explorer LT 114AZ Review: Don't Fall Into The Trap. However, it has the lowest aperture, which will limit your viewing capacity. What you can see will improve according to the size of the aperture. Telescope Mount Type: Alt-Azimuth. StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ | Celestron Saturns rings and the Cassini Division within them look fabulous, while its dimmer moons and cloud belts are a bit harder to spot. *This post may contain affiliate links. ), Deimos vs Titania (How Are They Different? Compare Celestron StarSense Explorer vs Celestron NexStar 130 SLT vs Celestron 130 vs Celestron DX 102AZ . Optical Design: Newtonian Reflector. Before the main discussion, lets see the fundamental difference between both telescopes. Unfortunately, the adjustment range on the device supplied did not allow it to be aligned accurately, and for the test, we used another one that we already had. Join us in this discussion to learn more. Buy from scopes' recommended retailer, HighPoint, StarSense Explorer technology helpful in locating targets. These eyepieces have a lot of plastic in their build, but use glass optics and are fairly sharp, with more eye relief than a typical Plossl ocular (particularly beneficial with the 10mm). Visit our corporate site (opens in new tab). We may earn commissions by recommending products on this website. . So, it doesnt require collimation or cleaning. In principle, the StarSense Explorer tech is basically a bracket to point your phone at a small mirror that has been aligned to the telescope mount, and then uses the phones onboard camera and processing power to plate-solve. Get the StarSense Explorer; it has better accessories and is easier to use, Ive had my 130 for so long. Neptune and Uranus will be barely visible. Celestron Starsense Explorer 8 Dobsonian, Celestron Starsense Explorer 10 Dobsonian. Celestron dx 102az weighs around 6.4 kg. Celestron dx 102az comes with two 1.25 eyepieces. The details will be a lot better than dx 102az. The 80 mm model is the smallest with the weakest viewing capacity, and the 254 mm model is the largest with the best. Open star clusters look great and benefit from the 102AZs wide field of view, but globular star clusters are little more than fuzzy balls. Uranus and Neptune might barely be viewable at the max magnification that the Infinity 102AZ can handle. Stargazing Help is a participant in Amazon Associates program. The alt-azimuth mounting means that you can move the instrument around two axes up and down (altitude) and from side to side (azimuth). Thanks Zane; Ill take a look at Dob reviews. That being said the main difference is only that the Apochromatic is better at focusing wavelengths of light resulting in fewer visual discrepancies occurring when viewing through it. Compare Celestron StarSense Explorer vs Celestron DX 102AZ vs Celestron 130 Is that telescope comparable to this model? After much debate, we finally know everything that there is to know regarding the two telescopes. Though you won't have the activation code, it will open and test your phone for compatibility. However, we have some reservations on telescope vendors and recommend that you go with HPS. Mainly interested in the mount and optical tube. A star diagonal is standard with astronomical refractors and reflects the beam from the focuser through 90 degrees to allow a much easier observing position than crouching on the ground looking up through the tube, but usually, it has the drawback of reversing the image as in an ordinary mirror. Yes, the Celestron StarSense Explorer telescopes are good. What's more, the instrument comes with everything you need for a night under the stars: two eyepieces a 25 mm and 10 mm, which offer magnifications of 26x and 66x a StarPointer red-dot finderscope, star diagonal and tripod. Any additional thoughts you have to sesparate the two? Which is better than the image youll see from normal reflector optics. At its core, the StarSense Explorer actually uses a relatively old technology known as plate-solving. Mostly Astromaster and Powerseekers. $449.95. Saturns ring or Jupiters clouds can be seen clearly with more colours. With the Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ, which links the telescope to modern mobile phone technology and computing power, Celestron has made locating objects in the sky not just easy, but fun especially for those just starting out in a skywatching hobby. To completely overcome false color you need a considerably more expensive apochromatic refractor or a reflector. Because all these mountings use a standard Vixen-type or CG-5 dovetail attachment, you can attach any other instrument that uses the same dovetail, taking into account the load capacity of the mounting. Is it because of the 4 vanes as well? StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ Smartphone App-Enabled Telescope - Amazon.com So all that is left is light gathering. StarSense dock for your smartphone. Brand new in 2022 are the two new Dobsonians in the range this Starsense Explorer 8-inch Dobsonian, and the 10-inch version covered below. Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ telescope review will also probably upgrade in 5 years or so. The accessory tray that sits in the middle of the tripod legs needs to be attached by fiddly thumb screws that are already in place. The only bad thing upon assembly is that I have the same problem as you did, the altitude axis on my mount is also too tight to freely the OTA up and down. The scope is alsoavailable on Amazon, which is unquestionably the most popular e-retailer in the United States, even when telescopes aloneare taken into account. I am sorry but I have zero knowledge on this so please excuse my raw language ! The Celestron Starsense DX 6 is exactly the same as the DX5 above but has a larger 6-inch aperture instead. The Celestron dx 102az telescope is not good for viewing faint objects. It has one 25mm Kellner eyepiece with 26x magnification power. Now that we know a little bit about the two telescopes lets take a look at this graph for a more comprehensive view: Both the Celestron telescopes are good choices in their respective categories. For use as a grab and go/ compliment for my 8in dob. For $399 you can get a much more capable telescope with a larger aperture, e.g. Now, when talking about accessories its important to discuss the eyepieces. Your email address will not be published. Moving from one object to another takes just seconds the quickest finding system weve seen. Boasting a whopping 10-inch aperture, the Celestron Starsense Explorer 10 Dobsonian is a beast of a telescope. Why use such a time-consuming means of attachment? View Map. I would avoid both. DXC Technology helps global companies run their mission-critical systems and operations while modernizing IT, optimizing data architectures, and ensuring security and scalability across public, private and hybrid clouds. So undoubtedly, Celestron dx 130az is the winner. For purchasing this telescope, we highly recommend HighPointScientific, the largest telescope retailer in the United States. This StarSense Explorer DX 102 review was written in January 2020, when the scope was first released for $399. There are eight different Celestron StarSense Explorer telescopes which we cover in more detail below. Here's the full lineup of StarSense Explorer telescopes in order of price (low to high): StarSense Explorer LT 80AZ Refractor. I already have eye pieces. In instructions intended for raw beginners, points such as this are vital. Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ: Full review | Space It would kill your phone quite fast. Now you are in business and you can choose from a list of objects observable with this instrument at the time, graded according to whether they can be seen from the city or from a dark sky. Its also not flexible to eyepieces other than the 1.25 ones. Thanks so much in advance. The StarSense Explorer DX-102 is limited to brighter objects by the nature of its small aperture. India | GlobalLogic Its a great budget option, but if you have the space and intend to use it mostly at home then the 114AZ will give you more power for a similar price. So, what is so special about the Celestron dx eyepieces? These views will be much brighter and clearer with the larger aperture models. You wont be taking this on trips. Some drawbacks do become evident. For example, if Saturn or the Andromeda galaxy are above you that night, you can select them on the app and then follow the arrows on the app to point the telescope at them. Any advice would help. You can upgrade your telescope set up later with some Barlow and Plossl eyepieces. I am trying to get my 9 Year old interested in this and the only reason why I was considering the 130 was because of the Star sense app which makes it super easy to find deep space objects and galaxies. The altitude slow motion is equally stiff to turn, while the azimuth control had an annoying backlash. A 32mm Plossl will provide 20x, with a slightly wider true field than the included 25mm ocular, but is of debatable usefulness. Once set up, you need to align the red-dot finder with the main instrument by day. If you disregard factors like size and portability, then the Celestron Starsense Explorer 10 Dobsonian is the best as it has the highest aperture and will provide the best views.

Maui Restaurants Closing Coronavirus, Karastan Kashmere Carpet, Military Time Minutes Conversion Chart For Payroll, Articles C