waiting to send decision to author npj

In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles The Editor has made a decision and requested you revise the submission. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. The thinnest lines in the final figure should be no smaller than one point wide. If this is not possible in a combined manuscript file, authors should either submit separate high resolution figure files or deposit image data in a suitable repository (e.g. Here, we have developed a screening system that enables us to determine the activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) by . The cover letter is not shared with the referees, and should be used to provide confidential information, such as conflicts of interest, and to declare any related work that is in press or submitted elsewhere. When creating and submitting digital files, please follow the guidelines below. Ranges are more appropriate than standard deviations or standard errors for small data sets. If you have submitted your manuscript to an Editorial Manager journal but you have not yet received a final decision, you can check its status online. Thus, we ask authors to recolor green-and-red heatmaps, graphs and schematics for which colours are chosen arbitrarily. The Editors also reserve the right to reject a paper even after it has been accepted if it becomes apparent that there are serious problems with the scientific content or with violations of our publishing policies. 0, :3.0 | :25.0IF6.0NCBI, 310 Each figure legend should be presented on the same page as its figure. Reviewers submit their reports to the Editor. Copyright 2014-2023 All Rights Reserved. Only papers that have been published or accepted by a named publication or recognized preprint server should be in the numbered list. 2002 Use distinct colors with comparable visibility and avoid the use of red and green for contrast. Provide images in RGB color and at 300 dpi or higher resolution. A competing interests statement is required for all accepted papers published in the npj Series journals. | SCIWaiting to Send Decision to Author, @12:21ManuscptReviseandRe-Review, @5:, , @13:ManuscptReviseandRe-Review, @16:, Geotechnical Engineeng With Assessor, SCIreviewNot Assigned, SCIreviewers assigend, , Eupean Polymer Journal with editor, sciunder review reviews invited, worduse 2007 or later version, mateals letters 3Required Reviews Completed. Editors and Reviewers will be responsible for assessing the completeness of the characterization. "The male with the appointment at the university? We can accept LaTeX files at the acceptance stage, but before then please supply compiled PDFs. Authors are permitted to post the final, published PDF of their article on a website, institutional repository or other free public server, immediately on publication. . Journals can customize the wording of status terms. [CDATA[// > Scale bars should be used rather than magnification factors, with the length of the bar defined. It's a way of ensuring only articles of the highest quality, which describe sound research methods and results, are published. It is not unusual for this stage to take more than a month. Usually when a paper is received for publication, the Editor in chief considers the paper and then transmits it to the. Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. 3170 USD as publication fees (article processing charges or APCs). Editorial decision making and the peer review process. Approved human gene symbols are provided by HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC), e-mail: [email protected]; see also www.genenames.org. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. For some journals, the status may include the decision term e.g. [CDATA[> Is it a bad sign if the status shows "Ready for Decision" for a long time? Authors must justify the use of a particular test and explain whether their data conform to the assumptions of the tests. This checklist is not sent to the Reviewers but must be received by the Editors before the paper can be sent for peer-review. Sometimes, this can take anywhere between 2-6 weeks. Collections and special issues follow the standard peer review policy. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. There are several factors that influence the time taken for review, most notably availability of article referees. "But sending the abortion drug through the . The Editor has recommended the submission be transferred to another journal, and your response is needed. The revised version is normally sent back to some or all of the original referees for re-review. The corresponding author is notified by e-mail when the Editor decides to send a paper for review. Each journal is able to customize the wording of the status terms, but the same status phases apply to all journals using Editorial Manager. The editorial team decides whether to send the manuscript out to review. Published conference abstracts, numbered patents and research datasets may be included in the reference list. 'Submission Transfers Waiting for Author's Approval'. Online material: The journals operate under a collaborative editorial model, with active researchers engaged as manuscript-handling Editors, supported by in-house, PhD-trained Nature Portfolio managing Editors. Asked by Narmin Mammad When all remaining editorial issues are resolved, the paper is formally accepted. Keep reminding the Editor about the status of your paper. Any Supplementary Information should be submitted with the manuscript and will be sent to referees during peer review. The peer review of any submissions for which the Editor has a competing interest is handled by another Editor who has no competing interests, to ensure that the evaluation of these submissions is completely objective. In today's Big Idea, author Christian Klaver invites us to take a look into the magical world he created for his book-loving daughter. 110 2016513Chem Liu, L.; Ruiz, David A.; Munz, D.; Bertrand, G., A Singlet Phosphinidene Stable at Room Temperature. Watch the Checking the status of your submission video for more information. The authors must include copies of all related manuscripts with any overlap in authorship that are under consideration or in press elsewhere. on 24 Nov, 2017. Authors will see a proof that will include figures. The author submits a manuscript and it receives a tracking number. When submitting a final manuscript for publication, all figures must be uploaded as separate figure files ensuring that the image quality and formatting conforms to the specifications below. RH performed the histological examination of the kidney, and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. Improve the chances of your manuscripts acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. Note that once completed reviews for your submitted article have been received and are under evaluation by the handling Editor the status may later return to 'Under Review' if additional reviews are sought. The editorial team discusses the reports and the Editor makes the final decision. Answer: When the status for a manuscript changes "Under Review" to "Ready for Decision", it means that the peer-review process is complete and only the editorial decision is pending. March 29, 2023 | Nature CommunicationsTips: NCOnline: 140250268 . Serum Response . Below are the key events which you can track using Author Services. Responses to requests for admissions are due within 30 days after service, except that a defendant may serve a response within 45 days after service of process and the initial pleading on that defendant. Finally, editors need to assess these reviews and formulate a decision. Unusual units or abbreviations should be spelled out in full or defined in the legend. 2023-04-26 4061 513. 0, Decision Sent to Author 21st Feb 22Waiting to Send Decision to Author 18th Feb 22Manuscript Under Consideration 18th Feb 22Manuscript Under Consideration 31st Jan 22 Editor Assigned 24th Jan 22Manuscript Received 24th Jan 222.15I have asked one of the Associate Editors, Prof. Nicolas Dzamko, to assist me with the assessment and possible peer review of your manuscript and I will contact you as soon as this process is complete., 79

Hamblen County Arrests 2021, How Often Does Volaris Cancel Flights, Articles W

waiting to send decision to author npj

You can post first response comment.

waiting to send decision to author npj